Where the result came from
Trading result−$136
Funding+$1
Trading fees−$42
Net result−$178
Closed positions only, in dollars. This describes the money; it is not how the score is built.
Where the evidence sits90% range 41.0–46.8
Dream Bigger is rated Average. Its record shows no clear evidence of skill either way. Its 90% range runs from 41.0 to 46.8. The ranges of 209 other rated vaults overlap with this one, so on current data they can’t be told apart.
Concentrated in one assetMost of the result comes from one asset (BTC 100%), and the score is reduced for it.
- Return on record
- −77%
- $1 became $0.23 since the vault’s start
- Max drawdown
- −80.5%
- largest fall from a peak
- Deposits
- $24
- 4 depositors · closed to new deposits
- Rated window
- 209 days
- 20 Mar 2026 – 15 Oct 2026
Track record
Daily, after fees and funding. Deposits and withdrawals are left out, so new money never counts as profit.
$1.06 on 20 Mar 2026 $0.23 on 15 Oct 2026
The vault started before this chart: $1.06 on 20 Mar 2026 is what $1 put in at its start was worth then. The rating covers trading from that date.
Deepest daily point −78.8% · peak 20 Mar 2026, trough 22 Sep 2026, not recovered yet · worst day −34.1% on 3 Jun 2026
The maximum drawdown in the summary is the rating’s own measurement and can be deeper than one point a day shows.
3 of 8 months up · best +32.3% in Jul 2026 · weakest −60.1% in Jun 2026
The first and last months can be partial.
Results by asset
| Asset | Positions | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 62 | −$178 |
How it trades
- Style
- Swing trading
- Closed positions
- 62
- Win rate
- 33.9%
- Median holding time
- 14.9 h
- Assets traded
- 1
- Maker share
- 6%
Risk
- Max drawdown
- −80.5%
- Daily volatility
- 6.69%
- Worst day
- −34.1%
- A bad day, 1 in 20
- −10.9%
- Largest single asset
- BTC · 100%
- Own liquidations
- None found
Capital and flows
- Vault capital
- $24
- Leader’s share of the vault
- 100.0%
- Leader’s cut of profit
- 10%
- Depositor money in and out
- $24,604
- First trade
- 20 Jul 2025
Depositors’ money moving in and out is left out of the return, so a popular vault isn’t penalised for attracting money.
From the leader
My approach is simple yet precise: I only trade clear, repeatable setups, maintaining a consistent strategy with a high probability of success.
The vault’s own description on Hyperliquid, not checked by Brierz.
Audit trail
- Computed
- 19 Oct 2026, 12:40 UTC
- Method
- Version 0.9
- Data
- Hyperliquid API and Hyperliquid trade archive
- Latest input
- 15 Oct 2026, 01:56 UTC
Checksum of every input (SHA-256). Any later change to the inputs would change it.
a8b49b357876cb0cceef78b2ab799949e3bfadef16e908290587080e85cab6c2When each input was read
- Closed positions
- 13 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC
- Trades
- 13 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC
- Funding payments
- 15 Oct 2026, 01:56 UTC
- Deposits and withdrawals
- 15 Oct 2026, 01:56 UTC
- Account state
- 15 Oct 2026, 01:56 UTC
Run this vault, or build on the ratings?
Vault leaders get the full report and can reply to it. Platforms can show Brierz ratings in their own product.