Where the result came from
Closed positions only, in dollars. This describes the money; it is not how the score is built.
Mad Scientists is rated Average. Its record shows no clear evidence of skill either way. Its 90% range, 43.4–56.0, includes 50, so luck can’t be ruled out. The ranges of 234 other rated vaults overlap with this one, so on current data they can’t be told apart.
Concentrated in one assetMost of the result comes from one asset (HYPE 68%), and the score is reduced for it.
Daily, after fees and funding. Deposits and withdrawals are left out, so new money never counts as profit.
$1.00 on 6 Feb 2026 $1.38 on 14 Oct 2026
One point a day: $1 put in at the vault’s start, after fees and funding. The dashed line is $1.
Deepest daily point −23.1% · peak 3 Jun 2026, trough 10 Jun 2026, recovered in 4 days · worst day −11.5% on 9 Jun 2026
The maximum drawdown in the summary is the rating’s own measurement and can be deeper than one point a day shows.
7 of 9 months up · best +11.3% in Aug 2026 · weakest −0.8% in Oct 2026
The first and last months can be partial.
Closed positions only, in dollars. This describes the money; it is not how the score is built.
| Asset | Positions | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HYPE | 51 | +$10,312 | |
| LIT | 21 | +$1,425 | |
| NEAR | 11 | +$575 | |
| TAO | 16 | +$303 | |
| ZEC | 7 | +$174 | |
| PUMP | 9 | +$114 | |
| VIRTUAL | 7 | +$79 | |
| LINK | 6 | +$38 |
Depositors’ money moving in and out is left out of the return, so a popular vault isn’t penalised for attracting money.
€ν€₹¥₮Ω¡₪g ¡$ A₪ €Χ₽€₹¡m€₪₮
The vault’s own description on Hyperliquid, not checked by Brierz.
Checksum of every input (SHA-256). Any later change to the inputs would change it.
30b2cac2029984879319333591a10a34abc91c36dc894d5ea20b4e58468d8c3fVault leaders get the full report and can reply to it. Platforms can show Brierz ratings in their own product.